Outsource Software
美国. globalization质询的技术主角
软件开发成群外出在美国被证明是一根避雷针。 关于采购的辩论。 但一位专家在讨论会说美国。 保持清楚的创新领导根据专利。 卡内基-梅隆大学的克里斯·工头说软件服务外购，主要对印度，而创新数据库和办公自动化软件继续这里被写。
如果平稳的衰落以联邦研究美元与衰落一起在美国，继续，然而那可能改变。 电脑科学毕业生，工头说。
暂时，专家结束，美国保留钥匙对创新。 问题，他们多久补充说，是为？
快的评论
改正我，如果我错误，但”清楚的创新领导根据专利”不会退色，如果和当客户进一步外购软件开发移动朝开放来源基于解答。 看早先岗位： Open Source and Offshore Development
April 26th, 2006 at 3:34 pm
Patent and copyright are not mutually exclusive with open source licensing; they can and do co-exist. Also, consider that being the leader in innovation in a certain industry, no matter how that might be measured, doesn’t necessarly mean that production in that industry will be in the innovators geography - especially today.
Arguably, however, innovative concepts in an industry will come from where that industry’s production occurs. Innovation in steel production and the automotive industry mostly come out of Asia now, though some still comes from the USA.
Another point is that areas of interest change. Steel, Railroads, Automotive, Aerospace, Telecommunications, Electronics, Software, Digital Everything, Nanotech/Materials Science, Biotech, Genomics, Proteomics, Interactomics, Analytics - interests change, innovation happens in new areas. What’s next? What’s after that? Those are the questions for innovation - not who’s doing software development the cheapest.